Session Information
Date: Tuesday, September 24, 2019
Session Title: Tics/Tourette
Session Time: 1:45pm-3:15pm
Location: Les Muses Terrace, Level 3
Objective: We investigated the performance of VGS and MGS to see whether the pathophysiology of TS represented the dopaminergic deficiency.
Background: Tourette syndrome (TS) is a neurobehavioral disorder starting from childhood characterised by motor and vocal tics. Some suggest primary hypodopaminergic state followed by upward regulation of dopamine receptors for the cause of tics. We previously reported slightly prolonged visually-guided saccade (VGS) latency and significantly prolonged memory-guided saccade (MGS) latency in Parkinson’s disease.
Method: We recruited 62 male drug-naïve participants with TS and 49 normal controls who were 5—16 years old. In VGS, after illumination of a central spot for 2.0—2.8 s, a target was presented at locations 5°, 10° or 20° to the right or left. The subjects moved their gaze from the spot to the target quickly. In MGS, a target stimulus flashed for 50 ms while they fixated the central spot. Once the spot disappeared, they moved their gaze to the remembered location, where the light re-appeared 600 ms later. Each subject performed at least 36 VGS and 36 MGS trials. Eye movements were recorded by electrooculography. The latency of the saccade from the extinction of the central spot and amplitude of the first saccade were measured in each trial. Age-matched analysis on 29 pairs was performed by Student’s t-test.
Results: [VGS] The median of latencies in TS was comparable at 5°, whereas it was longer at 20°. The difference between latencies towards peripheral (20°) and central (5°) targets was larger (49.1 vs 32.6 ms*). The median of amplitudes was smaller in TS (4.9 vs 5.4°* at 5°, 18.3 vs 19.0°* at 20°). [MGS] The median of latencies in TS was shorter at 5° (324.1 vs 338.5 ms), whereas it was longer at 20° (308.4 vs 290.3 ms). The difference between latencies towards central and peripheral targets was smaller (15.8 vs 48.1 ms). The median of amplitudes was comparable. Success rate of MGS was lower (61.5 vs 83.1%†). The occurrence of saccades to cue was comparable. * p< 0.05, † p< 0.01, otherwise not statistically significant.
Conclusion: In TS, latencies to peripheral targets in VGS and MGS were longer than in normal subjects.
To cite this abstract in AMA style:
Y. Sugiyama, H. Fukuda, Y. Terao, S. Tokushige, K. Hoshino, M. Hamada, Y. Ugawa, T. Toda. Saccade profiles in Tourette syndrome [abstract]. Mov Disord. 2019; 34 (suppl 2). https://www.mdsabstracts.org/abstract/saccade-profiles-in-tourette-syndrome/. Accessed November 21, 2024.« Back to 2019 International Congress
MDS Abstracts - https://www.mdsabstracts.org/abstract/saccade-profiles-in-tourette-syndrome/